Now and Later vs. Good and Plenty

[PBarnum]

I say wait for APR patch. Everyone has patience whether they show it or you force it

 

[Dudeman418]

Ok, voted on option#4 instead, because of reasons posted by Thothie.

 

[jaythreee]

I agree with option #4. If the patch is going to be late anyways, might as well split it into parts. This allows ample time to create a worthwhile patch and hopefully not be as problematic as releasing the entire patch asap. Basically quality over quantity.

 

[Picadilly]

I'm going to be the black sheep and say I like option 1 (with stacked rewards and XP), and the chance to get to play the finished lodagond series.
But, if you guys go for double, triple, whatever patch, our server will patch as many times as needed. I don't mind multiple patches per month, at all.

 

[Sabre]

Agreed, multi-patches make it seem like there's less distance between each month's patching...Cause it is xD

 

[Netrogor]

I hoped I voted for number four. Wasn't really looking at my monitor when I voted.

 

[Dejiko]

I hoped I voted for number four. Wasn't really looking at my monitor when I voted.

you can change your vote afterwards

 

[CrazyMonkeyDude]

I don't look at my monitor when I vote ^^.

 

[Mikkel]

Okay okay... I now offer option #4, the one-two punch patch. I'll have to see at least two server hosts vote for that... There's going to be a lot of "omfg, I just updated!" going on if we do that. I think ye can change yer vote, if ye already voted.

I voted 4

 

[Tetsmega1]

I say you should release them more early, as we would adapt in to gameplay quicker.

 

[Orochi]

I'm up to my ass in university work, but the viewmodel consolidation will be finished this weekend.